Letter: Stop Annexation, In The Name Of Love

Editor:

The newly formed Israeli coalition government promises to focus on only COVID 19-related matters, with one glaring exception: by July 1, the government can proceed with the process of annexing portions of the West Bank. Faced with a national (indeed, worldwide) health emergency, the incoming Israeli government has declared that annexing occupied Palestinian territory can’t wait.

Why the rush? Politics, mostly American politics. Prime Minister Netanyahu is keenly aware that America holds an election in November and that President Trump stands a very real chance of losing. Israel wants to capitalize on President Trump’s “deal of the century”, which seeks to pressure the Palestinians to accept a state much smaller – and more dependent on Israel – than that envisioned in previous negotiations. Indeed, the Trump Administration further enticed the Israeli government when Secretary of State Pompeo declared that the U.S. would not object if Israel annexed parts of the West Bank in the event that the Palestinians, as anticipated, refuse to negotiate with Israel over what amounts to the terms of their surrender to the “deal of the century”. Netanyahu and his allies realize this opportunity will likely not be offered by a Biden administration.

Several European governments recently warned Israel that annexing all or part of the West Bank would violate international law. A former Israeli ambassador to South Africa has pointed out that the Trump plan, coupled with Israeli annexation, would result in isolated, non-contiguous Palestinian areas in the West Bank that resemble the discredited “bantustans” of the apartheid era.

Notwithstanding these disturbing realities, I oppose Israel’s race toward annexation because I care deeply about Israel’s future. Before Israel undertakes the momentous step of annexation, her leaders need to be reminded: be careful what you wish for. Dangerous unintended consequences for Israel abound. Members of Israel’s defense community have warned that annexation may deal a fatal blow to Israel’s security cooperation with the Palestinian Authority. Israel’s peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan may be jeopardized.

Israel’s looming annexation presents the organized American Jewish community with its own moment of truth. For years, our major organizations have emphasized that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict can only be resolved through bilateral negotiations. Major American Jewish institutions have been quick to condemn unilateral Palestinian efforts to pressure Israel through international forums such as the United Nations and the International Criminal Court. Now the shoe is on the other foot. Israel is seeking to unilaterally impose its will on the Palestinians. Israel has dropped any pretense that it seeks “unconditional” negotiations and offers the Palestinians only limited talks to implement the terms of a Trump deal which overwhelmingly favors Israel. Relatively few American Jewish leaders thus far have spoken out against the prospect of annexation. Major Jewish organizations – both in Colorado and nationally – thus far remain silent.

I cannot be silent. I love Israel too much. I know that the best solution to the conflict – a strong and secure Israel and an economically viable Palestine living side by side in peace and security – is at this moment out of reach. I know that the Palestinians are far from blameless regarding the current state of affairs. But I also know this: Israel’s impending annexation of West Bank territory is counterproductive, reckless and wrong. I intend to do everything I can between now and July 1 to oppose Israel’s plans.

I hope you’ll join my colleagues at J Street Colorado in our upcoming campaign to resist annexation. We’ll be launching our campaign in the coming days. Stay tuned.

Tom Feldman, Denver
Co-Chair, J Street Colorado

About Staff

They call me "NewsHound IV," because I'm a clever Finnegan, sniffing out stories all over the Boulder area. I love Jewish holidays because the food is GREAT, especially the brisket. Well all the food. I was a rescue pup and glad to be on the scent!

Check Also

unrecognizable multiracial dissenters with placards on city roadway

Column: Loudmouth Profs “Dare to Dissent”

Ticker examines different outcomes for two professors who bashed different sacred cows.

empire state building new york

Column: ‘Anger Issues’ Drive an Anti-Israel Bully

Saadah Masoud pledges to address his “anger issues.” Does this mean he will no longer strike Jewish New Yorkers because they are Jewish?

2 comments

  1. Clayton Miller

    The land in question belongs to Israel under international law. Specifically, Article 6 of the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine (preserved under Article 80 of the UN Charter) calls for “close Jewish settlement” on the land west of the Jordan river. Consequently, Israel does not need to “annex” it.

  2. Stanley I Kreis

    The article says, "Several European governments recently warned Israel that annexing all or part of the West Bank would violate international law. " Yes, and the same governments have recently reiterated their approval of continued Palestinian Authority payments to terrorists and their families (which are enticements of the Pal population to attack Jews). So, no, these Euro governments remonstrations against Israeli annexation don't impress me. J-Street is just another Pal to the Pals, and not a fair organization to both sides as they claim. They are there to attack Israeli security measures. Applying Israeli law instead of Israeli military law to the West Bank Area C is an "about time" measure of the Israeli government, at the least.

%d bloggers like this: