Letter: J Street/NJN Statement

Letter: J Street/NJN Statement

Dear editor:

Reading “J Street and New Jewish Narrative React Following Attack on Iran” (BJN 6/22/2025) condemning the Trump administration for an “unauthorized attack on Iran” one could forget that President Obama dropped hundreds of bombs on Libya. He too had no Congressional approval – because none is required.

J Street and NJN advocate for diplomacy as the way to ensure that “the Iranian regime cannot be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon” yet they did not clamor for Iran to adhere to diplomatic initiatives when it repeatedly denied IAEA inspectors access or when Iran enriched uranium far beyond civilian use.
After the latest attempts at diplomacy culminated in Iran’s insistence on continuing to enrich its own weapons-grade level material (rather than import what it would need for peaceful purposes) it became clear that Iran was not a serious partner in talks.

Once it possessed nuclear weapons, Iran would not need to even pretend to negotiate ever again. Its “negotiating” position would be, “Do what we say, or else.”

Iran funds and trains the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas; its missiles and bombs have brought death to Syrians, Yemenis, Lebanese, Saudis, Americans, and of course Israelis. The brutality it wreaks on its own people is another horror story that shows they have no boundaries. We can not know what will happen next but years of making empty statements to wish-away Iran’s nuclear ambitions clearly has not worked.

Lynn Koss
via email

About Guest

Guest users submit their own posts - letters, op-eds or articles. By-lines appear within the article. Boulder Jewish News is not responsible for the content of these posts, and they may not reflect the views of BJN or its staff. These posts are published because BJN believes the content is of interest to the Boulder Jewish Community.

Check Also

Opinion: Hollywood’s Ten Commandments

Opinion: Hollywood’s Ten Commandments

Many of Hollywood’s leading actors have in recent years consistently adopted a clearly anti-Israel agenda, with many critics claiming that their declarations have a stench of anti-Semitism masquerading as criticism of the Jews and the State of Israel.

Column: When Keffiyeh-Wearing Patients…er, Shrinks…Take Over the Asylum

Column: When Keffiyeh-Wearing Patients…er, Shrinks…Take Over the Asylum

Bruce Ticker critiques modern psychologists' political advocacy at conventions, particularly relating to Palestinian liberation, while expressing concern over the lack of acknowledgment for Jewish issues and rising antisemitism within the profession.